Several examples show that one shouldn‘t chase after the responsible investment theme without carefully considering the fundamental characteristics of the businesses, Guillaume Compeyron writes on finews.first.
finews.first is a forum for renowned authors specialized on economic and financial topics. The texts are published in both German and English. The publishers of finews.com are responsible for the selection.
Since its inception in October 2017, the Harvey Weinstein case has had global repercussions that we see under the #MeToo banner. What we see less are the consequences of this scandal on the business world that saw a so-called «Weinstein clause» appear in certain mergers-and-acquisition contracts. This provides for recovery provisions for a portion of the price of transactions in the event that inappropriate behavior is discovered within management.
This example is not insignificant: it shows that non-financial considerations emanating from civil society and taken into account by businesses can have a negative impact on the financial results of these businesses. It is clear that a standard for responsible behavior has not only emerged — it has also taken on greater significance.
«There are a number of ways to read the subject»
Increasingly, analysts are scrutinizing the stance of businesses towards social, environmental and governmental issues (the same way they do with their balance sheets and income statement), in search of potential weaknesses that might lead to financial penalties. Their observations are grouped under the theme of «responsible investment», that is to say, investment that incorporates extra-financial factors.
However, since there is no clear consensus on investment taxonomy or philosophy, there are a number of ways to read the subject. Despite the burst of initiatives aimed at establishing a common language for sustainable finance, the problem persists and is visible in several sectors, such as energy.
«Yet, the reality is more complex»
United under key international agreements, governments deemed it urgent to limit global warming. The use of price incentive schemes is one solution. This is the case with the CO2 emissions quota trading scheme, a strategy used within the European Union to encourage industries to reduce their emissions.
Yet, the reality is more complex: take EDF, the French energy giant, for example. The majority of energy it produces is derived from nuclear power (89 percent) which does not release CO2 emissions, partly protecting it against these measures. The difficulty stems from the controversy surrounding nuclear power, specifically following the Fukushima disaster. Therefore, the degree of responsible investment is set by each client or by each analyst according to their analysis of economic and environmental challenges.
«When all available capital runs after an idea»
Another crucial factor to consider is the impact of responsible investment on performance. To better understand it, we need to look to the classic law of diminishing returns. When all available capital runs after an idea, the result is an effect opposite to the one sought.
Investment becomes less and less productive and the market could reach overcapacity, as shown in the case of solar energy. In 2011, weak demand combined with significant overcapacity caused profits to plunge; as a result, the benchmark, MAC Global Solar Energy Index, lost two thirds of its value. Following this, its performances have been weak in recent years.
«The answer is a pragmatic and non-dogmatic approach»
Then comes the phenomenon of subsidies, as seen in China in particular, where the government implemented a voluntary program in this area. Suddenly, in June 2018, the government made the decision to cut subsidies for the majority of solar energy projects, thus triggering a new drop in shares in the sector.
These examples show that one shouldn‘t chase after the responsible investment theme without carefully considering the fundamental characteristics of the businesses. The answer is a pragmatic and non-dogmatic approach. It is possible to create long-term value for investors by integrating these factors in conjunction with traditional management.
Guillaume Compeyron is a financial analyst at Syz Asset Management.
Previous contributions: Rudi Bogni, Peter Kurer, Oliver Berger, Rolf Banz, Dieter Ruloff, Werner Vogt, Walter Wittmann, Alfred Mettler, Peter Hody, Robert Holzach, Craig Murray, David Zollinger, Arthur Bolliger, Beat Kappeler, Chris Rowe, Stefan Gerlach, Marc Lussy, Nuno Fernandes, Richard Egger, Maurice Pedergnana, Marco Bargel, Steve Hanke, Andreas Britt, Urs Schoettli, Ursula Finsterwald, Stefan Kreuzkamp, Oliver Bussmann, Michael Benz, Peter Hody, Albert Steck, Andreas Britt, Martin Dahinden, Thomas Fedier, Alfred Mettler, Brigitte Strebel, Peter Hody, Mirjam Staub-Bisang, Nicolas Roth, Thorsten Polleit, Kim Iskyan, Stephen Dover, Denise Kenyon-Rouvinez, Christian Dreyer, Kinan Khadam-Al-Jame, Robert Hemmi, Anton Affentranger, Yves Mirabaud, Katharina Bart, Frédéric Papp, Hans-Martin Kraus, Gerard Guerdat, Didier Saint-Georges, Mario Bassi, Stephen Thariyan, Dan Steinbock, Rino Borini, Bert Flossbach, Michael Hasenstab, Guido Schilling, Werner E. Rutsch, Dorte Bech Vizard, Adriano B. Lucatelli, Katharina Bart, Maya Bhandari, Jean Tirole, Hans Jakob Roth, Marco Martinelli, Beat Wittmann, Thomas Sutter, Tom King, Werner Peyer, Thomas Kupfer, Peter Kurer, Arturo Bris, Frederic Papp, Claudia Kraaz, James Syme, Peter Hody, Dennis Larsen, Bernd Kramer, Ralph Ebert, Marionna Wegenstein, Armin Jans, Nicolas Roth, Hans Ulrich Jost, Patrick Hunger, Fabrizio Quirighetti, Claire Shaw, Peter Fanconi, Alex Wolf, Dan Steinbock, Patrick Scheurle, Sandro Occhilupo, Claudia Kraaz, Will Ballard, Michael Bornhäusser, Nicholas Yeo, Claude-Alain Margelisch, Jean-François Hirschel, Jens Pongratz, Samuel Gerber, Philipp Weckherlin, Anne Richards, Michael Welti, Antoni Trenchev, Benoit Barbereau, Pascal R. Bersier, Shaul Lifshitz, Klaus Breiner, Ana Botín, Michel Longhini, Martin Gilbert, Jesper Koll, Ingo Rauser, Carlo Capaul, Claude Baumann, Markus Winkler, Konrad Hummler, Thomas Steinemann, Karin M. Klossek, Michael Welti, Christina Boeck and Michel Longhini.
